joe_rogers_11155 wrote:in the case of battlefield 3, it feels like the consoles are actually suffering from PC-itis, because i think the PC version would just be fucking epic. (not counting SP, where I think it is just some didn't-try-to-impress game design)
I can assure you that it is. Sure it has it's flaws, but they are updating like crazy fixing issues. As soon as I heard consoles will be limited in the number of players in a server I knew it was going to cause the game to suffer. This game is basically the new crysis in that it pushed the envelope of graphics. The game play is good and totally new in that it has a ton of new options. Things like binding a button to hold your breath while sniping to increase you aim. That is a lot of attention to detail. But the thing I always found lacking in COD games, aside from the headache inducing bit, was the fact that the it seems very much run and gun. Once I played BC2 and actually had to compensate for bullet drop, other games seems less challenging. But I have never played a game that made me react the way BF3 has. It keeps you on your toes. 32 on 32 is nuts, in a good way. It takes some getting sued to, but it is the tits!