It is currently Fri May 31, 2024 4:21 am




Mr Happy wrote:what really bothers me is jobbs says he invented it, he didnt, its a worse mousetrap. he also claims its the first one to use a real computer os. wake up jobbs, stop ripping of your customes and shareholders, and please go away



ShaDoW wrote:The Wanderer: Cisco lost the iPhone trademark in 2005, early 2006, so why shouldn't they use it.



DarkDemonenator wrote:I think its funny how you can get exactly all that junk, with better features, on phones that have been out now for more than a year.
I have an SNES emulator on my phone, and a 453mhz CPU. I WIN.




The Wanderer wrote:ShaDoW wrote:The Wanderer: Cisco lost the iPhone trademark in 2005, early 2006, so why shouldn't they use it.
aah, didn't knew they lost it :p, weird that they then have filed a lawsuit.





source-maps wrote:a Quad Core CPU , arent that like 4 cpus?

-[Getty]- wrote:I'm really not much of an apple fan (their computers are great, but not for gaming, and they make you use iTunes. Ew). This iPhone is a really bad idea if you ask me. So if every other phone with an mp3 player, internet, a full keyboard, email, etc. IT'S A PHONE, YOU CALL PEOPLE WITH IT, NOT CHECK YOUR EMAIL AND SURF THE WEB. Seriously. My phone is about 1/4 that things size and I love it. No camera, no internet, just a phone. If you tried sticking that iPhone into your pocket it would cause you to tilt to one side and you would end up walking in a big circle due to the fact that it weighs 50 TIMES MORE THAN A PHONE SHOULD. (exaggeration). Anyway, that's my view on the iPhone. And every other phone-that's-more-than-just-to-call-people.




Users browsing this forum: No registered users