Imo that definition is false. When you tolerate something, it is an act in itself. Thinking may be construed as an act, but I mean acts in the physical world. Its NOT an attitude (of course if you insist on that no matter what due to your definition we wont get anywhere). If I would hate gays for instance, and I would sit next to a gay and hit him in the face or try to kill him because of it, I would be intolerant to him being gay. If I hate gays and dont hit him but just sit there and leave him be, I might have *intolerant thoughts* but Im being tolerant of him, I am tolerating his being there.
If you accept that last bit, that one is tolerating something by letting something be, but still insist that you are intolerant by thinking that it shouldnt, then you would also say one can be intolerant and tolerant at the same time, which imo is bullocks.
As to your "worded opinions";
If I was gay, and somebody would write gay jokes on a forum I might get hurt. I would still let them go ahead because they have the right to utter gay jokes on a forum (if the forum admin allows them), due to free speech and all. I would not be against gay jokes AS LONG as people avoid saying them directly to me or in my close proximity to consciously hurt me or make me feel bad. And jokes arent even necessarily opinions.
Pure opinions should be allowed to be voiced. Period. Its of course something else when they are deliberately uttered to demean someone, but in general opinions are enveloped by the right to free speech. Even if theyre strong. People should be allowed to say that Hitler was great, people might feel bad, it might be wrong, but thats the way freedom of speech works. You might say something undoubtedly true and some crazy sect gets really hurt because it doesnt fit into their crazy religion, but they cannot forbid you to say it.
Wiki:
Intolerance is the lack of ability or willingness to tolerate something.
That fits my *opinion* on the definition of (in)tolerance a little better, although the "willing" part is a little sketchy. When you are unwilling you usually dont, which I interpret as act, and thus the definition shouldnt be formed like this either.
Imo it should be "Intolerance is not to tolerate" or something. And "Tolerance is to allow something to happen or allow someone to be or commit certain actions". Obviously defining tolerance in a proper way is a little harder
PS:Arg, too much writing too little working!