esJ wrote:KILLA-COW wrote:Shit I think the tradegy of the whole situation was all the innocent lives lost so who gives a damn who did it?
K, I'll just go shoot someone in the street tomorrow. If I break down crying at the tragedy of the innocent life that was lost ... its all gravy yeah? Because nobody will "give a damn who did it" ... right?
Idiot.
What an absolutely ludicrous analogy. Well I'd imagine if you shot someone in cold blood they'd probably catch you, and if there was reasonable doubt, there'd probably be an investigation to see if you were wrongly accused and then if you were it is likely you would be released and the real culprit caught. The family I imagine would be upset by the event and distraught at the loss of a loved one and would probably be satisfied in the result you've been charged.
The thing is here, terrorists were blamed and it is REASONABLE to assume that it was commited by terrorists, you know like 7/7 and various other terrorist attacks, so there is a proven track record, unlike (perhaps) the american government. There is just as much logic in assuming it was terrorists than there is with your arguments that it was the american government.
Going back to your 'analogy' if you shot someone, or at least were suspected, if you had attempted to shoot countless other people, had murdered others in cold blood, had reason to dislike (a motive) this person and there was evidence to suggest you were in the right area, you lacked an appropriate alibi and you admitted guilt, then yes I would say there is perfect cause for you to be arrested charged and locked up to everyones satisfaction, eventhough people could come up with some conspiracy theory shitting themselves because they want to be the big shot that uncovers the scandal, that someone else did it.
Like I said, maybe time to move on?