Theology

Chat about serious topics and issues. Any flaming/de-railing will be deleted.

Theology

Postby Terminator on Sun Jan 22, 2006 6:30 pm

YokaI wrote:Its funny because the religion he loves so much is the thing that causes some of the biggest wars.

What religion is that? Islam can easily be accredited as being the most dangerous religion in human history, as anyone who knows history (real history, not those "politically correct" myths) knowns that it is responsible for over 1200 years of slaughter and oppression...

Religion itself is the thing that used to cause so many wars. Today it is oil and money, but I am rambling.
Back to flaming this "Wacko Jacko" asshole...
Last edited by Terminator on Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby zombie@computer on Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:22 pm

Terminator wrote:
YokaI wrote:Its funny because the religion he loves so much is the thing that causes some of the biggest wars.

What religion is that? Islam can easily be accredited as being the most dangerous religion in human history, as anyone who knows history (real history, not those "politically correct" myths) knowns that it is responsible for over 1200 years of slaughter and oppression...

Religion itself is the thing that used to cause so many wars. Today it is oil and money, but I am rambling.
Back to flaming this "Wacko Jacko" asshole...
yes, the islam is resposible for these so called crusades that killed millions. And lets also forget the fact nazis were christian, the kkk was offcourse as islamitic as the moon, the spanish conquistadores were islamitic monks and mass-slavery wasnt made up by christian europeans...

Oppression? who did they oppress for 1200 years? You mean their women? Dont judge the culture of other people by the standards of your own.

Believe me, if theres one peacefull religion in this world, it is the islam. And bhudism. Dont start flaming the beliefs of millions because you have read stuff that is as biased as most american media. please dont

back to jack
what a dickhead
When you are up to your neck in shit, keep your head up high
zombie@computer
Forum Goer Elite™
Forum Goer Elite™
 
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Lent, Netherlands

Postby Terminator on Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:53 pm

zombie@computer wrote:
Terminator wrote:
YokaI wrote:Its funny because the religion he loves so much is the thing that causes some of the biggest wars.

What religion is that? Islam can easily be accredited as being the most dangerous religion in human history, as anyone who knows history (real history, not those "politically correct" myths) knowns that it is responsible for over 1200 years of slaughter and oppression...
yes, the islam is resposible for these so called crusades that killed millions. And lets also forget the fact nazis were christian, the kkk was offcourse as islamitic as the moon...

The Crusades were defensive wars. Most of the Crusaders were noblemen who simply abandoned their estates to rescue the oppressed Christiand and Jews in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Hardly barbarian farmers. The Crusaders were very civil, spreading modern farming methods and building new cities wherever they went.

There were only a few blights on their deeds, which have been grosely inflated and blown out of proportion in recent years by politically correct elitists:

One is the sacking of Jeruselem during the First Crusade. Simply put, that was very typical of armies for the time, and the Muslims who had invaded Europe and triggered the Crusades did far worse to every single village and city they conquered. Plus, the Crusaders did give fair warning to the city, and most citizens left before the attack. What is left out of school history books is the destrouction wrought by the Muslim counter-attack, when they took the city for a second time, destroyed all the temples and killed 90% of the population...

Second was the accidental sacking of Constantinople. I say accidental, because it was started by the disowned Prince of the Byzantine Empire, who wanted to seize the throne from his father. He tricked the Crusaders into believing that Constantinople had been conquered by the Muslims, and they simply became a pawn of politics. Needless to say, they were not very happy when they discovered they had just attacked an ally...

Third was by a deranged maniac who led a small splinter group of crusaders against the Jews in the Reinland. You could count the number of towns attack in that fiasco in one hand, and the number killed was only a few hundred. Yet it gets big attention in modern media...

These trivial acts cannot be allowed to overshadow the situtation if that era. Europe was in real danger of being brutally conquered by the invading Muslim armies, which laid waste and pillaged everything they touched. The Pope called for a Crusade as a last-ditch defense to drive back the invaders. If he had not done so, Europe would be Islam today, Christianity would be illegal (along with every other religion), there would be no America, the world would still be considered flat, and technology would not have advanced much beyond the 11th century. Society would be completely stagnate.

We should all thank the Crusaders for saving Europe and starting the chain of events that led to the Rennaisance and modern Western society. Do not scorn your history: learn it and love it. A society that is displeased with itself is easy to conquer and subjugate, which is exactly what Islam has been trying to do since 450 years before the First Crusade...

Let us just leave it at that.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


And yeah, that Jack is an anti-game dickhead.
I am hardly surprised that he is getting all those death threats. He brought it upon himself, and he deserves it.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby marnamai on Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:08 pm

If he had not done so, Europe would be Islam today, Christianity would be illegal (along with every other religion), there would be no America, the world would still be considered flat, and technology would not have advanced much beyond the 11th century. Society would be completely stagnate.


You don't know that for sure...
Islam invented the timecycle (sec/min/hour/day/week/month/year,...)
Maybe the science would have evolved even further then we only could dream about today ... You can only guess that it would stagnate, it the takeover didn't happen so this is pure speculation. Just as America guessed that all countries in the middle-east are "evil" terrorists (but no they only did it for oil). Bush should better spend the money he used for war for science and devolp somekind of alternative energy source for oil...
User avatar
marnamai
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Belgium

Postby Athlete{UK} on Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:24 pm

I think the lot of you see thing way too black and white.

Quite frankly i think Christianity calling islam evil or vise versa is like the teapot calling the kettle black. They are both responsible for a hell of a lot of suffering and oppression.

No matter how far this argument goes there will always be evidence to support both sides of the argument.

Ok maybe the muslim armies were getting too big for their boots and mothing into europe but it's a big exaduration for you to say that they were hell bent on taking over the world and the christian armies were entirely just in what they did.

On the other hand The christian armies did see a lot of things as protecting their home land.

Quite frankly i have majour views against organised religion of any sort because this kind of thing happens.

Anyway enough off topic. If you want any more dicussion on "which religion is the more evil" make your own thread but i warn you i'll probably lock it within a day because i don't know a topic which invites more flame then religion.
User avatar
Athlete{UK}
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: Stoke

Postby Terminator on Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:25 pm

There is a fundamental difference between the religions that allowed science to blossom on the West, while the Middle East simply copied what they could, and it all boilds down to the nature of God.


The West, which is dominately Christian, believes that God is good. Such a God therefore created the universe within a set group of rules, and these rules could be discovered by man. Bingo! You have science.

Islam, on the other hand, states that Allah is all-powerful. To say that Allah is good would be limiting Allah in some manor. Therefore, there are no rules to the universe in the eyes of devout Muslims. No rules to discover = paralyzed science. That, and the fact that science and art are considered trivial things by Muslims, simply because they have no place in religion.


Plus, anyone who has actually read the Qu'ran (Koran in English) knows the true face of Islam. The fact that Muslims try to reassure us Westerners by saying that Islam is peaceful and tolerant is a carefully planned lie. Read the Qu'ran, and you will find it instructs followers to not only lie to unbelievers, but to conquer and enslave those that you do not kill. The Qu'ran is literally filled from cover to cover with such things as "slay the unbelievers" (found verbatum in 9:5; 2:191, and in slightly different wording in many other places).

Read the Qu'ran. I really is an enlightening, and hair-raising experience for someone in the Western culture. It will also give you great insight into what goes on in the heads of suicide bombers, and tell you all you wanted to know about jihad. Scary stuff indeed: a religion based upon unrelenting warfare against nonbelievers, with an afterlife based solely on human lust and greed. The perfect opposite of Christianity. As a former Christian myself, I could easily classifiy it as the very religion of the anti-Christ...

Winston Churchill read the Qu'ran and had this to say (condensed because it was actually a long vehement rant): "Islam . . . paralyses the social development of those who follow it."
Last edited by Terminator on Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby zombie@computer on Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:27 pm

maybe one of the mods can split the thread from when we wandered off into the religious crap? Its getting very offtopic but i got the feeling we have much to discuss about it

These trivial acts cannot be allowed to overshadow the situtation if that era. Europe was in real danger of being brutally conquered by the invading Muslim armies, which laid waste and pillaged everything they touched. The Pope called for a Crusade as a last-ditch defense to drive back the invaders. If he had not done so, Europe would be Islam today, Christianity would be illegal (along with every other religion), there would be no America, the world would still be considered flat, and technology would not have advanced much beyond the 11th century. Society would be completely stagnate.

We should all thank the Crusaders for saving Europe and starting the chain of events that led to the Rennaisance and modern Western society. Do not scorn your history: learn it and love it. A society that is displeased with itself is easy to conquer and subjugate, which is exactly what Islam has been trying to do since 450 years before the First Crusade...
Islam is a far more social religion than christianity ever will. A true muslim gives 10% of his paycheck to the poor, christians give 10% of their paycheck to pay for a senile old man in a too big church (thats also plain ugly from the inside, but that may be personal)

as for science, the islam doesnt stop science in any way. Christianity flourished only because of its wealth. if Europe would have become islamitic (which would have been far better, as there would not have been countless of xtian-muslim wars), science would still make the same evolutional steps as it does now (perhaps not at the same speed, thats only speculations). You know as much as i do that you cant stop science in a wealthy enough civilization.

I dont see where you found that the islam would make x-ity illegal. The islam is, in its core, a very peacefull religion. I dont know where you got that hostility crap, but i can assure you the bible has just as much of that crap in it. Only the poverty most islamitic countries have is driving the hatred from the extremistic sides of the people
When you are up to your neck in shit, keep your head up high
zombie@computer
Forum Goer Elite™
Forum Goer Elite™
 
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Lent, Netherlands

Postby Athlete{UK} on Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:35 pm

Terminator wrote:There is a fundamental difference between the religions that allowed science to blossom on the West, while the Middle East simply copied what they could, and it all boilds down to the nature of God.


The West, which is dominately Christian, believes that God is good. Such a God therefore created the universe within a set group of rules, and these rules could be discovered by man. Bingo! You have science.

Islam, on the other hand, states that Allah is all-powerful. To say that Allah is good would be limiting Allah in some manor. Therefore, there are no rules to the universe in the eyes of devout Muslims. No rules to discover = paralyzed science. That, and the fact that science and art are considered trivial things by Muslims, simply because they have no place in religion.


Plus, anyone who has actually read the Qu'ran (Koran in English) knows the true face of Islam. The fact that Muslims try to reassure us Westerners by saying that Islam is peaceful and tolerant is a carefully planned lie. Read the Qu'ran, and you will find it instructs followers to not only lie to unbelievers, but to conquer and enslave those that you do not kill. The Qu'ran is literally filled from cover to cover with such things as "slay the unbelievers" (found verbatum in 9:5; 2:191, and in slightly different wording in many other places).

Read the Qu'ran. I really is an enlightening, and hair-raising experience for someone in the Western culture. It will also give you great insight into what goes on in the heads of suicide bombers, and tell you all you wanted to know about jihad. Scary stuff indeed: a religion based upon unrelenting warfare against nonbelievers, with an afterlife based solely on human lust and greed. The perfect opposite of Christianity. As a former Christian myself, I could easily classifiy it as the very religion of the anti-Christ...

Winston Churchill read the Qu'ran and had this to say (condensed because it was actually a long vehement rant): "Islam . . . paralyses the social development of those who follow it."


Ok gonna split the topic

For well over 400 years christianity practically forbade scientific advancements you really do have to be living in a fantasy world to not notice the fact that people who practice chemistry astronomy, Biology and ideas behind basics physics were deemed heretics and systematically killed. Why do you think throughout the middleages technology didn't move on at all?

Seriously you ask any histories we'd be well ahead in technology if it wasn't for them.

P.S winston churchill was a twisted mindfuck. he just happened to be fighting for the "good guys"
User avatar
Athlete{UK}
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: Stoke

Postby Terminator on Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:07 pm

Ok gonna split the topic

Cool. Thank you.

Long post, so please bear with me and read it all...

Zombie:
I have no idea where you are getting your information, but, respectfully, it is 100% wrong. Have you actually read the Qu'ran? What about studies done about the meaning of it and how Muslims follow it?

Did you know that Muslims consider the Qu'ran to be, literally, a fax from God? The Bible is open to interpretation, but the Qu'ran is not. Why is that?

The Bible is full of riddles and stories. Things that make you think.

The Qu'ran is full of anti-Christian and anti-Jew ranting made by a warlord, highlighted by quotes from Allah that speak directly to the reader. The Qu'ran is an instructional book that orders people to do exactly what it says.

Did you know that there are no moral values in Islam? Christianity has the Ten Commandments, Buddahism and Shintoism have their virtues, but where are virtues in Islam? There are none. A Muslim can do whatever dastardly deed he pleases, so long as he views it as being "good for Islam". He can go around chopping the heads off of unbelievers (just like the Qu'ran says to do: "...and strike at the necks of the unbelievers...", and his fellow Muslims will praise him for it.

You sound like one of those politically correct people who make up myths and re-write history to try not to offend anyone. The truth is quite different, and someone is going to get offended. You cannot go around re-writing history when you are afraid of a lawsuit! History is history.

Try picking up some history books written before the recent politically correct bullshit began. Before the 1950s would be a good time to start. Read what they say about the Crusades, and you would think it is a totally different subject when you compair it to what it taught today. Back then, the Crusaders were known as the good guys, and they blatently told the truth about Islam. Unfortunately, history has been re-written with modern lawsuits to paint the Crusaders as barbarians and islam as the most peaceful religion ever.

Islam brings peace only through war. It spreads by the sword, exactly as Allah instructs in the Qu'ran.



If it makes you feel any better, I was once in your position. I thought I knew everything about Islam and the Crusades. I recently decided to do some research and sort out truth from fiction, and boy, was I surprised! The truth was almost the exact opposite of what I had been taught in school!

Why? Most of this change comes from what is called being "politically correct", or rather, trying to say something without hurting someone's feelings. This is an effort in futility, because no matter what you say, someone, somewhere would be offended by it.

I prefer what is called "politially incorrect", which is just saying something the way you mean it: no understatements or exaggerations, and no sugar coating. Right between the eyes -- smack you upside the head -- right to the point.

History should be politically incorrect, can we agree on that? If so, then perhaps you too can open your mind to what you have not been taught, and the history that was hidden from the West in recent decades... Our leaders pull the wool over our eyes and tell us to sit down and shut up. You must break through this boundary to discover the true nature of the modern world.

Sure, you can go into classic denial and ignore the whole subject, or continue trying to argue with myths that you have been told were truth, but eventually the truth will shine through the dark fog of myths and lies. I hope that everyone can see through that fog...


Athlete wrote:For well over 400 years christianity practically forbade scientific advancements you really do have to be living in a fantasy world to not notice the fact that people who practice chemistry astronomy, Biology and ideas behind basics physics were deemed heretics and systematically killed. Why do you think throughout the middleages technology didn't move on at all?

Seriously you ask any histories we'd be well ahead in technology if it wasn't for them.

I agree, but your analysis is false. This is a well known and often believed myth about the Dark Ages. The fact is that technology DID advance. Look at the evolution of weaponry, torture devices, fortress construction, and architecture. Alchemy led directly to chemistry, and astrology to astronomy. Advancement was hindered by religion, but there was some improvements. Ironically, it was those advancements that paved the way out of the Dark Ages...

Yes, it was a sad period, and I am not saying that Islam is the only religion with a bad history. In fact, every single religion has its bad times, and most want to forget it. The problem is, when you forget or re-write history, you open the door for the same mistakes to repeat themselves.

Everyone here can say that the repitition of bad history is a terrible thing, right? Who wants to see another Hitler rise to power, just because it was deemed to "aweful" to put in history books? If you arm yourself with the knowledge of how such things begin, they can be stopped from happening again.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby Athlete{UK} on Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:11 pm

Ok it was a bit far me saying it didn't move on at all. You're right it did mostly in architecture and construction (like i said astrology and alchemy was seen as unholy most of the time)

Advancement didn't entirely stop but thanks to religion it was massively impeded.

I mean the only advancements in biology were made in thinking of new ways to tourture a heretic.

By the way you know there are a lot of muslims who see the Qu'ran as containing metephores and being a guide as well as many christians who believe the bible us 100% fact and competely literal.

How do you know that what you say is right? "striking at the necks of the none believer" ok you could take that to mean chop his head off but there are many metephorical translations for that as well.
User avatar
Athlete{UK}
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: Stoke

Postby Terminator on Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:21 pm

Athlete{UK} wrote:I mean the only advancements in biology were made in thinking of new ways to tourture a heretic.

Yes, but there is one major difference between other religions and Islam in that respect: Islam could never have spawned modern biology.

In Europe, people drew up diagrams of the human body to better understand how it works, and earlier, how to keep it alive during torture.

In Islam, artistic representations of the human body are strictly forbidden. You will never find a human anatomy book with pictures written by a Muslim, nor will you ever find pornography of any sort, or anything related to that. Even simple photographs have strict guidelines that only allow the face or a scene without people.

Such limitations naturally prevent any form of modern medicine from emerging. It is a prerequisite to understand the body before you can treat it, and this could not be done in Islam.

Today, all medicine in the Middle East and Northern Africa (major Islamic areas; spread through Africa by conquest I might add) is either copied from the West or limited to home herbal recipies.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You see, throughout history, the only credit that can be given to Islam for any scientific advancement is just the idea. Yes, they are credited with developing our number system and algebra, but it was the West that adopted and utilized those systems to advance.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby Athlete{UK} on Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:45 pm

Oh the fact that there can be no representation of the human figure would hinder a lot of thigns true.

But i'd say being a massive part of developing our numerical system (which originated in india) goes to show that they weren't complete write offs.

The no human figure thing to me is just more religious twonk which is no different then saying that alchemy is a crime against good or saying anything other then the earth being at the centre of the universe is blasphemy.

Which again goes back to my point. Christianity and Islam both had a hand in messing up a lot of history.

I really think it's wrong that islam is portrayed as entirely the victims of the crusades whilst at the same time i think it's totally wrong who christianity is portrayed as saints in the modern conflict between east and west islam and christian.
User avatar
Athlete{UK}
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: Stoke

Postby somerandomnerd on Sun Jan 22, 2006 10:45 pm

Terminator wrote:There is a fundamental difference between the religions that allowed science to blossom on the West, while the Middle East simply copied what they could, and it all boilds down to the nature of God. [...] Therefore, there are no rules to the universe in the eyes of devout Muslims. No rules to discover = paralyzed science. That, and the fact that science and art are considered trivial things by Muslims, simply because they have no place in religion.



Where the hell did you get that crap?

A lot of the pillars our western sciences are built on owe more to the Middle East than to anything that originated in Greece or Rome. Where do you think our basic system of counting originated? (Clue: it's not roman numerals...) Can you tell what "al-jabar" is the root of? The word "equation" might date back to the 1400s, but the idea originated in the 8th century. Can you guess where?

Terminator wrote:Read the Qu'ran, and you will find it instructs followers to not only lie to unbelievers...


No- it says not to lie to your fellow muslim. A huge difference in the context of the tribal society Mohamed brought peace to.

Terminator wrote:...but to conquer and enslave those that you do not kill.


:shock:

Where, exactly, does it state that? Can you provide a quote?

What exactly does it say about "People of the Book"?

Pretty much the same thing that Jesus says about the old testament (ie. Judaism.) That it's teachings are the right idea, but needs to be set on track.

Islam is no different in the respect that it says that Christians and Jews have been set on the wrong track by it's corrupt teachers. It says that the only true prophet is Mohamed, who was given the true word of god. (Meanwhile, Christians say that Jesus is a part of the holy trinity- that he effectively is God...)

Now we're in a position where the subsequent teachers have taken the ideas in different directions and the same thing is happening all over again; the actual message is lost in arguments about what the message is...

Terminator wrote:Scary stuff indeed: a religion based upon unrelenting warfare against nonbelievers, with an afterlife based solely on human lust and greed. The perfect opposite of Christianity. As a former Christian myself, I could easily classifiy it as the very religion of the anti-Christ...


You know the scientific advances I mentioned earlier. Know how they got to Europe?

Athlete{UK} wrote:For well over 400 years christianity practically forbade scientific advancements you really do have to be living in a fantasy world to not notice the fact that people who practice chemistry astronomy, Biology and ideas behind basics physics were deemed heretics and systematically killed.


Not really- the Church was all in favour of science and progress, so long as it came from them. What it stood against was scientists teaching (preaching) something other than their message. Galileo wasn't arrested for saying that the earth could go around the sun; he had been granted permission by the Pope to teach about the evidence for the theory. He was arrested for teaching it as fact. At the time, there was evidence for it (much like there is evidence for evolution) but there wasn't the incontrovertible proof that there is today. Not terribly different to the state of some parts of America today... :roll: (Goes to show how far we've really moved on in the last 600 years...)

Athlete{UK} wrote:Why do you think throughout the middleages technology didn't move on at all?


Well, the Roman Empire which had held Western society together, had crumbled. What there was no need for, there was no drive behind.

But I wouldn't say that it didn't move on at all...

[EDIT- sorry, I missed a couple of posts before posting that...]
somerandomnerd
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:16 pm

Postby Spartan on Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:28 am

I'm not going to read through all that so instead I'm going to just jump on this thread once.

-Never take the bible literally. Also there are many versions of the bible most are severely misinterpreted.

-Never believe everything the church tells you.

-Make your own desicion about religion. Your not going to burn in hell for it.

-Pope John Paul II was a good guy who stuck by his beliefs without faultering. So stop bashing him for it.

-Islam is a peaceful religion. However with any religion there will always be those who twist it for their own gains.

-Many wars have been fought over religion.

-The crusades were unnecessary, and were started by the christians. They even refurred to the muslums as the "infidels". Sound familar?

-There is nothing wrong with being both religious and using science. In fact it's probably best to use both.

-Never bash someone else for their faith. It's not only insulting but's extremely arrogant.
Spartan
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:58 pm

Postby Torrean on Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:47 am

Spartan wrote:
-Never take the bible literally. Also there are many versions of the bible most are severely misinterpreted.


In certain cases, you can, but I see what you're saying, especially "gouge your eye out and throw it on the floor". Good post!
User avatar
Torrean
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:56 am
Location: In the Seeeealab (underneath the sea)
Next

Return to Serious Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users