Theology

Chat about serious topics and issues. Any flaming/de-railing will be deleted.

Postby Terminator on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:21 am

somerandomnerd wrote:
Terminator wrote:Read the Qu'ran, and you will find it instructs followers to not only lie to unbelievers...


No- it says not to lie to your fellow muslim. A huge difference in the context of the tribal society Mohamed brought peace to.

Exactly. It says lying is bad to a fellow believer, but deliberately instructs Muslims to lie to nonbelievers to further their own gains. To this day, Islamic nations forge false alliances with Western nations to make us complacent. Meanwhile, they build up their forces and bide their time for the right moment to attack. If Saudia Arabia or Iran had nuclear weapons, there is no doubt that they would use them against the West. Once they have such weapons, the only thing stopping them is the threat of annihilation from the Western retaliation. Do not be deceived...

Terminator wrote:...but to conquer and enslave those that you do not kill.

:shock:

Where, exactly, does it state that? Can you provide a quote?

Sure. Here are two translated quotes.
The wording is not identical, but remember that the words of the Qur'an are intended to be taken at face value and not "interpreted", as the Bible is. The English is a little weird, but it is very old...

Surah 2:190-195
And fight in the cause of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits. And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from where they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque (in Makkah) until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the reward of the unbelievers. But if they desist, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. And fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah, but if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.

Surah 47:4
Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been Allah's Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost.

You can look all you like, but you will not find entries this graphic or suggestive in the Bible. So much for compairing the two...

What exactly does it say about "People of the Book"?

Chapter 23, called AL-MUMENOON (THE BELIEVERS), is all about what Allah owns and controls, and how his followers should trust Allah.

Numerous other chapters strictly address the way believers should worship Allah, fight for Allah in his name, and die for Allah. They also address how nonbelievers should be placed in dhimmitude after being conquered, how jihad is the highest honor one can give to Allah, and other facets of Islam worth mentioning...


Islam is no different in the respect that it says that Christians and Jews have been set on the wrong track by it's corrupt teachers. It says that the only true prophet is Mohamed, who was given the true word of god.

Technically, the Qur'an tells Muslims not to force Islam upon unbelievers, but the total lack of moral values means that these unbelievers are placed in dhimmas and persecuted until they renounce their religion and join Islam. This is one reason why Islam spreads so quickly... Worse, this is sanctioned by Islamic law, which is national law in most Islamic nations.


As for those who think Islam is a tolerant religion; newsflash time. Try this test on for size...

I dare you to enter Saudia Arabia holding a Bible, and we shall just see if you get two feet before you are arrested and shot. In Saudi Arabia, the Shari'ah (strict Islamic law) is State law, and it is brutally carried out. All other forms of religion are banned, under penalty of death. Does that sound very tolerant to you?

If you enter this country as a Muslim, then decide to convert to another faith and leave the country, the State police will excecute your family and hunt you down and cut off your head, even if you move to another country. This is the mandate punishment for apostacy (leaving the faith), and similar laws are in place throughout much of the Islamic world, chiefly in Iran, Egypt, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Qatar, Sudan, Mali, Ethiopia, and Somalia. Again, does that sound very tolerant to you?

Hundreds of thousand of Americans who converted from Islam now live in fear for their lives from this kind of behavior. Their government refuses to protect them because they refuse to recognize the threat. The same thing is happening in Europe, when Islamic immigration is reaching a critical population percentage in some cities, and these immigrants are attacking law enforcement and driving out non-Muslims. Not very tolerant, huh?

Islamic law is starting to emerge in Eastern Europe today, and those countries are converting to Islam by immigration. It is not something we Westerners will like at all, as Shari'ah is strongly opposed to our existing legal systems and moral values...
Last edited by Terminator on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:37 am, edited 3 times in total.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby Jman on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:32 am

This is a REALLY bad topic, things could get really ugly.
User avatar
Jman
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:01 pm

Postby mabufo on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:37 am

Islam is not peaceful.
mabufo
 

Postby Terminator on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:42 am

mabufo wrote:Islam is not peaceful.

Finally, someone who sees reason. Good man. 8)

Actually, it would be more accurate to say that Islam is peaceful after it has conquered the whole planet, which has been its goal from the very beginning...



Still doubtful?
Read three translations of the Qur'an yourself. I just found them...
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/

Note that the Misconceptions page is highly selective of what they address and what verses they quote. Not encompassing the whole picture, are they? They do have a little "political correctness" in that part, but the Qur'an is the real gem on that page. Check that puppy out before you go making your conclusions...

Otherwise, it is a fair reference for the modern world...
Last edited by Terminator on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby -[Getty]- on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:43 am

Actually the crusades had nothing to do with religion. It was about tricking not-so-smart village people into killing a bunch of people so that the ruler of their country got the land they wanted.
source-maps wrote:a Quad Core CPU , arent that like 4 cpus?


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Club No Release
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
User avatar
-[Getty]-
Sir Post-a-lot
Sir Post-a-lot
 
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Terminator on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:48 am

-[Getty]- wrote:Actually the crusades had nothing to do with religion. It was about tricking not-so-smart village people into killing a bunch of people so that the ruler of their country got the land they wanted.

No, the Crusaders were usually those nobles you are trying to implicate. They selflessly left their riches and property to take up arms and repel the Muslim invaders, then charge to the rescue if the persecuted Christians and Jews in what is now Israel. The First Crusade did just that, and with such success that the Pope decided to try again in Africa, but that is where the Crusaders started getting their asses kicked, and their bad luck would continue until the end of the Seventh Crusade, when they finally gave up.

And you are correct that religion was not a major factor in triggering the First Crusade. Dispite the fact that it was the Pope who called for the act, and many Cristian Knights and Noblemen responded, it was actually a defensive counter-attack against the Muslim invaders, who had reached as far as central France and were invading Greece and laying siege to Rome. Something had to be done to repel the invaders, or Western society and Christianity would certainly be destroyed. Calling for a Crusade was the last hope of Europe...

Today, we fight a new Crusade against Muslim jihadists (Terrorists), only instead of horses and swords, we must fight with knowledge and politics. The Crusades are over, we thank the participants for their courage and saving Europe, but now the battle begins as these Muslim hardliners are trying to re-establish their traditional leaders and push for a renewed jihad against the West.


Try this book:
The New Concise History of the Crusades
by Thomas F. Madden; Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005
This is a briskly told page-turner that dispels innumerable “politically correct” myths about why the Crusades were fought, who fought them, and what happened during each one.
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby dragonfliet on Mon Jan 23, 2006 4:28 am

Wow, this thread is....something else. I don't have to to start pulling out my books (internet links are going to be worthless on this, as they're woefully inadaquate on this topic) but let me preface it with:

Both the Bible and the Qu'ran advocate violence, persecution, and killing your enemies. Both the Bitle and the Qu'ran advocate peace, tolerance and nonviolent advocation of the word of God. Both are open to interpretation. You're not going to see a lot of open interpretation in strict, middle eastern countries, but that's because they're very strict semi Theocracies. The same was true for very strict Christian Countries. That's not the fault of the source material, that's the fault of the PEOPLE in power.

Secondly, your statement that the crusades were essentially English Nobleman selflessly leaving behind their homes, family and riches for the purely religious intentions of preserving Jeruselum is cute, but horribly, woefully wrong. Don't get me wrong, there are numerous accounts of people that did exactly that, people that would fight to the glorious death for their religion, but the crusades weren't about that: it was about control of prime real estate and fighting an enemy. On that same note, the Barbaric, terrible muslims ALSO had a religious claim on that land and many were fighting for their pure, religious reasons, selflessly laying down their lifes for it. The reason for it though, was for money and power and land. Seem similar?

Thirdly. Religion is responsible for only a very, very, very small amount of wars. They are fought for money and for land and for power. I don't care if the pope orders it, it's not about religion, I don't care if it's a rallying call for Christians or Muslims or Hindus or whoever, it's being done for Greed, not for religion. Point out to me the number of major classes over a piece of land that was absolutely otherwise worthless. That was of no material value, that wasn't part of an important trade route, that didn't matter financially. Count them on your fingers, you won't run out of digits. Once again, don't get me wrong, there are a good number of battles fought over Shrines and burial grounds and areas of Ephiphany, but they are not the majority, and I can't think of a single WAR that was caused because of it, just battles, skirmishes.

Fourth. Of Course Muslims want to convert the entire damned planet, that's the word of their God. Guess what? Christians are trying to do the same damned thing, have been for Centuries; it's the word of their God as well. Everybody in every religion (mild generalization I realize) believes they're right. Otherwise, what's the point? They think they're carrying out the act of god, they think they're doing what's right, and they're relentless. That's what religion's about. Seriously.

If giving an Example of entering Saudi Arabia, an Extremist Islamic Theocracy, with a bible is your idea of an example, you're a fool. Talk to a Muslim in AMERICA. Most of them will be tolerant, though of course they think you're wrong and their right, but goddamn it, you think you're right as well. Imagine entering America in the 1780's with the Qu'ran, I'm sure they'd be exceptionally tolerant and let you go ahead calling them wrong...you know, or they'd burn you on the stake. An extreme example, but I don't really recall the Nazi's (Hitler was a very strong Christian) being tolerant of other religions. This isn't a fault of the religion, it's a fault of the GOVERNMENT that's using religion as a crux to it's power.

Oh, and your nice example of Modern medicine is so foolish I can't even begin. There are, yes, strict religious rules about the body, but guess what, I know a faithful muslim that's in medical school, who doesn't seem to have a problem with his text books. Once again, you're reffering to EXTREMIST examples in HISTORY. These mean nothing.

Yep, most predominantly Islamic countries are backwards, but that's not a fault of the religion, it's a fault of war, or environment, or whoever was in charge, or resources, etc. Turkey, while still not a great country (still much better than a large number of Primarily Christian Eastern bloc countries) is not technologically backward, nor do they punish Christians (or other relgions) with death. They do not forbid science, they do not wage war on non-Islamic countries, etc.,etc., etc.

I am a Christian, and a very devout one. I tithe to my church as well as give money to charities, I volunteer as well when I can squeeze it into my very busy life. I believe very firmly in my religion and I honestly think that every other religion is wrong. I don't believe in the "oh, they're all the same, as long as you're a good person" bullshit either. However, who the Hell am I to judge? I could certainly be wrong, these other people certainly believe, and I know very intelligent people that believe that way. They are free to practice their religion how they wish (as long as that doesn't involve murdering, etc., etc., etc.) and I fully support that. I'm pissed as Hell at France passing that goddamned law aimed at Muslim headdresses, and I'm a firm believer in the seperation of church and state.

Let me sum that up for you: I'm a stong christian, though not an extremist. I believe in religious freedom for ALL. I believe in my God, but don't think Priests should run countries. Extremists of ANY religion are terrible (anyone remember the IRA?) Shut up your goddamned hate mongering based on extreme examples Terminator, it's one of the most disrespectful things I've ever read.

~Jason
Image
User avatar
dragonfliet
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:28 am
Location: Houston...le sigh

Postby showNOmercy on Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:23 am

Religion is MAN made.

Terminator, the problem with religious debate is there is never a winner. Everyone knows they are right so it all ends basically the same as it started.

My two cents on this subject is for all to remember that the winners of the wars write the history.

Christians are so guilty of hanus crimes against humanity it is pitiful.

The thing about interpretation is just that, people guessing what someone else was trying to say by using their knowledge and opinions and experiences. Bibles and such are mans twisted version of BS that they want others to believe so they can control the masses. Plus, it is a HUGE business. Why not put the fear into people so they will keep coming back to show their faith by donating some $$$. I understand that there are many good people that help others and many churches do some good. I also believe that there are just as many that are bad and use people for self gain.

How is any one religion more correct or better than another. It is very arrogant to think this way. Religion is MAN made.

When a war is being faught, what do you think the leaders of these armies are telling their soldiers to keep them fighting. Religion is used as a tool for control. What better reason to crush thy enemies than for God. Peeple are very gullable and tend to believe what people of power tell them.

I could ramble on for ever..... I say Fuck all religion and decide for yourself what is right.
Jest@ wrote:disclaimer: i've never played WoW so i dunno if it's crap or not, but it is a time-wasting life-sucker fo' shizzle
User avatar
showNOmercy
Pheropod
Pheropod
 
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Pissing in someones Wheaties!

Postby YokaI on Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:44 am

You seem to have quoted me out of context. I wasnt expecting to start a debate about what I said. I believe that Jesus was a good man and he may have had some very good medical techniques. However, I dont believe he is magical. I would if the bible was written at the same time as jesus, however, it was about 300 years after. Knowing that, it is safe to say that many of the things in the bible are incorrect. The quotes, the story, the political issues of the time. They may not be correct and it may have just been a story blown way out of proportion. Eventualy, Christianity had become currupt and only supported the King and only spread the words of jesus for money and power.

I grew up as a catholic, and I dissagreed with everything my parents believe in and I still do. The feeling of hope is good, but not when you are killing those who disagree.

Religion should be taboo anyway, no one should descuss religion in public affairs usualy because stuff like this tends to happen. However, I stated this because jack thompson quoted the bible (or said something about jesus) and turned it against video games.
YokaI
Forum Goer Elite™
Forum Goer Elite™
 
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:38 am

Postby Athlete{UK} on Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:40 am

I think dragon is the person who got the closest to any kind of right here.

Terminator needs to understand that islam isn't some evil force looking to conqure the world as much as christianity.

I really have no idea why he manages to believe the quotes from the Qu'ra are advocating violence yet totally miss out about 80% of the old testiment.

As for somerandomnerd. Yeah i know you spotted to posts after but technological advancement really did stagnate. There was advancements but only stuff that didn't contradict the "teachings" of god which when it consists of God makes everything happen doesn't really leave room for that much.

There were of course other factors such as the roman empire collapsing but the christian state had a far bigg hand to play.
User avatar
Athlete{UK}
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: Stoke

Postby zombie@computer on Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:21 am

i think we should ban dragonfilet from these discussions, he always seems to be right,, and that usually stops the discussion because everybody agrees with him :lol:

anyway, Yes, dragonfilet hit the nail on the head. As far as the rest of the discussion, its getting very detailed to what is said in the koran (qu'ran for he wo cant pronounce koran :P ), and i dont have, and cant be arsed to get, information from that detailedness, so im affraid i wont be able to support whatever i am saying. From what ive heard from colleagues and friends which are muslim the muslim faith is as peacefull as any. Offcourse the history made them violent, all religions were violent. If they werent, they were gone (would you believe in a religion that tells you to love the people who believe in another god, while those other believers are killing your people by the thousands?).

What i do suspect, Terminator, oh Lord ( :wink: ), is that you are islamofobic. You seem to believe all resources that tell you the islam is bad and trying to conquer the world, and immediately disbelieve anyone that tells you otherwise.

The islam is violent in the common maps western view, simply because he is used to protest against people who step on ants on purpose. The western society has turned sissy, and the islamitic world still has to fight for every but of bread they can get. Once this changes (very soon; it is true the middle east is forging alliances with russia, china and europe, making sure the usa stays out (but thats another discussion); the western empire is falling, the eastern is rising: you cant stop it), and the islamitic countries are equal in wealth as the western countries, you will see their population will change, and turn from somewhat radical into peaceloving sissies that protest agaist cruelty to insects, just like us. It is the way things go when a society is deprived of threaths
When you are up to your neck in shit, keep your head up high
zombie@computer
Forum Goer Elite™
Forum Goer Elite™
 
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Lent, Netherlands

Postby DarkMortar on Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:24 am

IF YOU WANT PEACE DONT WORSHIP A RELIGION instead GO HINDUISIM OR BUDISIH. WESTERN REGILION IS VIOLENT
Image
DarkMortar wrote:If you copied and pasted this in notepad, you may be a nerd. If you just highlighted this, you may be intelligent. If you read this like it is, you may become blind.
User avatar
DarkMortar
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:19 am
Location: California, US.

Postby dragonfliet on Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:34 pm

DarkMortar wrote:IF YOU WANT PEACE DONT WORSHIP A RELIGION instead GO HINDUISIM OR BUDISIH. WESTERN REGILION IS VIOLENT


Correction. If you want peace, shoot yourself in the head because there's no way that you'll find it in this world.

~Jason
Image
User avatar
dragonfliet
Veteran
Veteran
 
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:28 am
Location: Houston...le sigh

Postby Terminator on Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:48 pm

DarkMortar wrote:IF YOU WANT PEACE DONT WORSHIP A RELIGION instead GO HINDUISIM OR BUDISIH. WESTERN REGILION IS VIOLENT

I agree, which is why I love Bushido and the martial arts so much. Western society has done everything it can to abolish to good and love that spawned from such a lifestyle, and unfortunately, it has been nearly destroyed. It is time for a ressurection of these basic human virtues of respect, honor, and justice for all, regardless of status.

GI
REI
YU
MEIYO
JIN
MAKOTO
CHU

Live them, cherish them, lest they become extinct before the corruption of modern capitalism...
Feed your ambition, and find your inner strength.
FedCom: dare to push yourself beyond all limits!

Visit our website, and find the future you've been looking for!
User avatar
Terminator
Been Here A While
Been Here A While
 
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:13 am
Location: FedCom

Postby desji on Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 pm

History is written by those victorious. And we are all western people, everything we touch, read, see is dominated by western culture. And frankly, I don't think any of us have the slightest idea what happened throughout history.

All religions have killed and saved people, i think of them as a way of explaining life. But it is a sharp sword in the wrong hands, and usually, with all religions, the sword end up in greedy mens hands.

I think that if you asked a computer with capability to answer all questions "How to stop war", it'd say the only possibility was to make destroy mankind. The same goes for religion.

The profession that has killed most people is not the soldier - it is the priest.
there is no spoon...
desji
Regular
Regular
 
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:08 am
Location: Denmark
PreviousNext

Return to Serious Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users