by vcool on Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:13 pm
I'm fairly certain Adobe knows more places that host "illicit" copies than we do. And if it really cared, most of them would be taken down.
Some of the russian trackers host torrents like TPB but they have rules for the copyright holders. So right at the top ther'es a link "to copyright holders" and some stuff is written there. And yes, some torrents are insta-deleted because the developers would care enough to visit the site and say "No.". The tracker I frequent, for example, does not host Photoshop despite its immense popularity, because the retail distributor of it in Russia asked them to not allow it.
As I've said it on numerous occasions before, "piracy" drives and helps all the extremely expensive software, like modelling software. If not for piracy, 60% if not more of all the modelling work shown on the Internet would not exist. There would be less tutorials. Game modding would stall. (I am fairly certain that around 50% of source mods have their models done not in Blender or The Mod Tool) The progress of the industry would slow down immensly as well, because it's this feedback of the many thousands of users that will keep improving software.
If companies like Autodesk (and they're pretty damn fucking rich. Anyone seen the invite I got from Autodek in the RandomThread? With a discount, a student ticket to their gathering costs nigh 2k US dollars.) really thought piracy was hurting them in the long run, most of the torrents would be gone because they could pull off some pretty sound cases with their triple-A lawyers that take 5k per hour of consultation. Sure, they will never kill "piracy" but instead of being the more or less mainstream phenomenon now, it will really become this dirty, underground thing the RIAA wants us to believe.
Anyways, those are my 2 cents, and I already voiced this more than once.
Neighborhood Forum Elitist