QuArK 6.5

[tarrryan]

so many buttons :shock: ill stick with hammer i think so i dont have to lern what they all do

[Athlete{UK}]

Well they are mostly different functions with brushes. You can do them all in hammer. But QuArK makes it a lot easier. I actually really like QuArK but still use hammer because it's what i know the best. I would learn QuArK but i am currently learning different modelling packages.

[Orion]

Hammer time.

[Nav]

those ss scary me thats a lot of buttons...

^^^

[BaRRaKID]

i'm still trying to learn how to use it tough its good to lear new stuff once in a while, specially with this editor which is compatible with lots of games.

[wisemx]

[Spas12]

hmm i played a quark map before, it was actually very good. It's just the the mix of textures that kinda make the game look weird.

But quark maps are good!

[zombie@computer]

hmm i played a quark map before, it was actually very good. It's just the the mix of textures that kinda make the game look weird.

But quark maps are good!

quark is just an editor, the resources are exactly the same...

[YokaI]

I used quark somebit. but i dont mind using hammer. so ill stick with the valve software ;D

[SlappyBag]

I would learn quark, but hammer is so much simpler, mainly because i know it. But i guess as it is compatable with alot of games, ill download, but not use it until im forced.

[Torrean]

After I dl it, are there any tuts on it, or is it self explanitory(sp?)?

[Spas12]

hmm i played a quark map before, it was actually very good. It's just the the mix of textures that kinda make the game look weird.

But quark maps are good!

quark is just an editor, the resources are exactly the same...

Hmm, i played a game that had HL engine with quake materials. I guees the names got me mixed up.

[mike-o]

I tried Quark for a while after i heard that Blazeeer uses it. Quark feels more like a modelling tool to me than a mapping program (or at least feels more like a modelling program than a mapping program does). It put more emphasis on vertices and edges rather than just having the "brush". Alot of Q3 mappers prefer it over QERadiant. I think they're insane.

[Athlete{UK}]

I tried Quark for a while after i heard that Blazeeer uses it. Quark feels more like a modelling tool to me than a mapping program (or at least feels more like a modelling program than a mapping program does). It put more emphasis on vertices and edges rather than just having the "brush". Alot of Q3 mappers prefer it over QERadiant. I think they're insane.

As i keep saying. Mapping tools are slowly becoming more and more like modelling tools. And tbh it's not a bad thing a all. You can do a lot more with the tool sets presented to you with a modeller then a mapper.

[verballydecapitating]

To run steam in offline mode you have to change the options so that steam saves your account information.