Yokai wrote:Is it just me, or would it be a better format to have a sub-catagory in complete maps called great maps where only admins can start the topic, the topic will be based on 1 map, and have users actually rate the map for gameplay and visuals. If it had a +10 and -10 spectrum, anything in the negatives should be removed from the list.
As it stands, I feel like this would be a much easier way to maintain the "great maps" without the admin having to step in to edit the initial topic. Also, discussion on 1 specific "great map" would be great so we can discuss or debate why or why it should not be on the list.
Just my 2 cents...
Whiffen wrote:On my freewebs site (Might make an actual website soon but I'm pretty lazy...) I'm going to be keeping track of the best L4D maps and review and archive them, but I think that would also be a good idea something like that on here like Yokai said. ^^
Vorneus wrote:Seconded.
-Ed
Psy wrote:I like that idea a lot. In fact, it would just be nice to be able to rate maps in the completed section.
Basically, that was the conversation. I've decided to relocate the discussion to a place where admins will check more frequently (this section) and a place where the conversation will be more organized and discussed. Basically, I feel that maps should be able to be rated in the complete maps section and there should be a subsection called great maps that all maps with above a 4 go to. The rating would be divided by visuals, gameplay, sound, creativity. Maps in the great maps section can be "booted" if more than x amount of people think it doesnt belong there, which also requires a reasoning with a world limit minimum.
Well, that's about it. We can talk about it some more though.